Super Bowl Taxes: Why Sam Darnold’s Tax Bill Shocked Even Football Fans

Every February, the biggest game of the year captures the nation’s attention: the Super Bowl. Fans focus on touchdowns, halftime shows, and championship celebrations. But this year, one storyline off the field has been just as dramatic as what happened on it: the tax implications of winning the game.

The 2026 Super Bowl ended in a victory for the Seattle Seahawks over the New England Patriots. But for quarterback Sam Darnold, the financial aftermath highlighted a quirky but important corner of U.S. tax law: how location and income apportionment can turn a payday into a giant tax bill.

Here’s what happened, and what Americans should understand about similar tax rules that could affect anyone with income earned in different states or from special events.

Sam Darnold’s Tax Bill Exceeded His Super Bowl Bonus

Under NFL rules, members of the winning team receive a set bonus. For Super Bowl LX, that amount was $178,000 per player.

Sounds great, until you look at the tax bill.

Because the game was held in California, which has one of the highest state income tax rates in the U.S., players are subject to what’s commonly called the “jock tax.” This rule taxes out-of-state athletes on income earned while playing in another state, based on the number of “duty days” spent there for practices, media obligations, and the game itself.

Using the duty-day formula and Darnold’s overall contract and earnings, analysts estimated that his California tax liability could be between roughly $200,000 and $249,000 — meaning his tax bill possibly exceeded the value of the Super Bowl bonus itself.

Another estimate put the extra tax outlay at about $71,000 more than his bonus payout. The specific numbers vary depending on how different outlets model income and exemptions, but the takeaway is the same: the tax bill on split-state income can eat up a big chunk of “winnings.”

What the “Jock Tax” Really Means

The phrase “jock tax” refers to state and local tax rules applied to non-resident athletes (and entertainers or business travelers in some jurisdictions). They work on the principle that if you work, even briefly, in a state, you owe tax on the income earned there, prorated to your time spent.

For Darnold and his teammates, that means counting all the preseason, travel, practice, and game days in tax states like California as part of their income allocation, even if they live elsewhere during the regular season.

That’s why a bonus for a one-off event like the Super Bowl doesn’t exist in a vacuum. Rather, it gets combined with the full calculation of how much income a player earned in that taxing jurisdiction.

It’s Not Just Pro Athletes Who Face Split-State Tax Rules

While professional athletes make headlines because of the size of their paychecks, ordinary taxpayers can run into similar issues when they:

• Work in multiple states during the year
  
  
• Travel frequently for business
  
  
• Earn income in other states, even for short assignments

In fact, many states require a non-resident tax return if you have income sourced in that state, sometimes even for a single workday.

And for people who travel across state lines regularly — consultants, entertainers, or even remote workers with multi-state clients — understanding these rules can make a big difference on tax bills.

What to Know About Super Bowl Betting and Taxes Too

This isn’t just about the players. Fans can face tax questions as well.

All gambling winnings are taxable at the federal level, including sports bets, lottery tickets, and casino payouts. That means Super Bowl bets that pay out are reportable income, even if the bettor doesn’t receive a tax form like a W-2G.

Starting with the 2026 tax year, a provision of the 2025 federal tax overhaul limits how much of your gambling losses you can deduct against winnings on your federal tax return, generally to 90% of your winnings, instead of 100% as in the past.

This can create what tax pros call “phantom income,” taxable income that doesn’t reflect your true net gain. So, even a breakeven bettor could owe tax if they’re not careful.

Why This Matters to Everyday Taxpayers

While most people won’t get a tax bill as eye-popping as Sam Darnold’s story, the underlying lessons are broadly relevant:

• Income sourced in multiple states can trigger unexpected tax liabilities.
  
  
• Traveling for business? You might owe returns in other states.
  
  
• Special events and bonuses don’t escape ordinary tax rules.
  
  
• Gambling and betting income is taxable even if you don’t expect it to be.

And, remember, this office is here to assist with whatever tax situations you find yourself in.